Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 203(2): 202-210, 2021 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757963

RESUMO

Rationale: Although early antimicrobial discontinuation guided by procalcitonin (PCT) has shown decreased antibiotic consumption in lower respiratory tract infections, the outcomes in long-term sepsis sequelae remain unclear.Objectives: To investigate if PCT guidance may reduce the incidence of long-term infection-associated adverse events in sepsis.Methods: In this multicenter trial, 266 patients with sepsis (by Sepsis-3 definitions) with lower respiratory tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, or primary bloodstream infection were randomized (1:1) to receive either PCT-guided discontinuation of antimicrobials or standard of care. The discontinuation criterion was ≥80% reduction in PCT levels or any PCT ≤0.5 µg/L at Day 5 or later. The primary outcome was the rate of infection-associated adverse events at Day 180, a composite of the incidence of any new infection by Clostridioides difficile or multidrug-resistant organisms, or any death attributed to baseline C. difficile or multidrug-resistant organism infection. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, length of antibiotic therapy, and cost of hospitalization.Measurements and Main Results: The rate of infection-associated adverse events was 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-13.1%; 9/125) versus 15.3% (95% CI, 10.1-22.4%; 20/131) (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98; P = 0.045); 28-day mortality 15.2% (95% CI, 10-22.5%; 19/125) versus 28.2% (95% CI, 21.2-36.5%; 37/131) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.89; P = 0.02); and median length of antibiotic therapy 5 (range, 5-7) versus 10 (range, 7-15) days (P < 0.001) in the PCT and standard-of-care arms, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was also reduced in the PCT arm.Conclusions: In sepsis, PCT guidance was effective in reducing infection-associated adverse events, 28-day mortality, and cost of hospitalization.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03333304).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/etiologia , Esquema de Medicação , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Seguimentos , Grécia , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sepse/sangue , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/mortalidade , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(1): 105836, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31704213

RESUMO

Although analysis of retrospective studies has documented survival benefit from the addition of a macrolide to the treatment regimen for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), no data are available to determine if there is differential efficacy between members of the macrolide family. In order to investigate this, an analysis was undertaken of data from 1174 patients with CAP who met the new Sepsis-3 definitions and were enrolled prospectively in the data registry of the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group. Four well-matched treatment groups were identified with 130 patients per group: clarithromycin and ß-lactam; azithromycin and ß-lactam; respiratory fluoroquinolone and ß-lactam monotherapy. The primary endpoint was comparison of the effects of clarithromycin with ß-lactam monotherapy on 28-day mortality. The secondary endpoint was resolution of CAP. Mortality rates for the clarithromycin, azithromycin, respiratory fluoroquinolone and ß-lactam groups were 20.8%, 33.8% (P=0.026 vs clarithromycin), 32.3% (P=0.049 vs clarithromycin) and 36.2% (P=0.009 vs clarithromycin), respectively. After stepwise Cox regression analysis among all groups, clarithromycin was the only treatment modality associated with a favourable outcome (hazard ratio 0.61; P=0.021). CAP resolved in 73.1%, 65.9% (P=0.226 vs clarithromycin), 58.5% (P=0.009 vs clarithromycin) and 61.5% (P=0.046 vs clarithromycin) of patients, respectively. It is concluded that the addition of clarithromycin to the treatment regimen of patients with severe CAP leads to better survival rates.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Claritromicina/toxicidade , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...